Summary
Python Environments extension telemetry (May 25, 2026 report) shows small but real counts of native Windows process-exit codes on PET v1.33 over 7 days:
| Exit code |
Meaning |
Events |
Machines |
0xC0000142 |
DLL initialization failure |
90 |
11 |
0xC0000005 |
Access violation |
49 |
12 |
0xC0000409 |
Stack buffer overrun |
30 |
3 |
PET has no panic::set_hook, no catch_unwind at the JSON-RPC dispatcher, and no shutdown event. We currently cannot attribute these on our side.
Tasks
Notes
This issue is mostly blocked on data from the extension team. The fix — adding a panic hook and a crash sentinel JSON-RPC notification — will be a separate issue; this one tracks the diagnosis.
Context
Filed in response to the Python Environments extension team's May 25, 2026 regression report. Volume is small (~150 events / 7d across the three codes) but the machine counts suggest a persistent crash for a subset of users rather than a one-off. Worth diagnosing now rather than after volume grows.
Summary
Python Environments extension telemetry (May 25, 2026 report) shows small but real counts of native Windows process-exit codes on PET v1.33 over 7 days:
0xC00001420xC00000050xC0000409PET has no
panic::set_hook, nocatch_unwindat the JSON-RPC dispatcher, and no shutdown event. We currently cannot attribute these on our side.Tasks
pet.process_restartevent).Notes
This issue is mostly blocked on data from the extension team. The fix — adding a panic hook and a crash sentinel JSON-RPC notification — will be a separate issue; this one tracks the diagnosis.
Context
Filed in response to the Python Environments extension team's May 25, 2026 regression report. Volume is small (~150 events / 7d across the three codes) but the machine counts suggest a persistent crash for a subset of users rather than a one-off. Worth diagnosing now rather than after volume grows.