Skip to content

Guided workflows in HDV production to ensure users deposit into proper workflows (Journals, collections, root) #435

@sbarbosadataverse

Description

@sbarbosadataverse

Slack thread: https://iqss.slack.com/archives/C08EF68QSSV/p1775055787448759

How far away are we from being able to guide users when they start production? For example, all these misplaced datasets that should go into journal collections?
Like a pop-up saying :

Is this submission for a journal? Yes? Here is a list of journals with collections in the repository
Will you deposit more than 1 dataset over time? Yes? Go directly to create a collection
Will you never come back after this one deposit? Here, deposit in the root.

Just wondering how difficult this would be, but would still like to think about how we design something like this to continue improving guidance over time. I don't want this to be a cut-and-paste of disconnected improvements to guidance.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned
    No fields configured for Feature.

    Projects

    Status

    SPRINT- NEEDS SIZING

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions